From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAAB69454
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  2 Mar 2021 08:12:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB2FE28B5E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  2 Mar 2021 08:12:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 165F928B53
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  2 Mar 2021 08:12:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D32E3418FD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  2 Mar 2021 08:12:25 +0100 (CET)
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210301094224.22203-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <03e08983-92d5-72c3-bce8-9f0ba98b3d18@proxmox.com>
 <59858abd-5032-2130-1aae-db734ecd8a50@proxmox.com>
 <c1a3b388-a734-8827-10f0-e5cbf3faebba@proxmox.com>
 <909038762.124.1614593932855@webmail.proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <f678f66c-0957-a726-6ee5-aa8b3377363d@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:11:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <909038762.124.1614593932855@webmail.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com, qemuserver.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #3324: clone disk: use
 larger blocksize for EFI disk when possible
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 07:12:57 -0000

Am 01.03.21 um 11:18 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
> 
>>>>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>>> index f401baf..e579cdf 100644
>>>>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>>> @@ -6991,7 +6991,15 @@ sub clone_disk {
>>>>>            # that is given by the OVMF_VARS.fd
>>>>>            my $src_path = PVE::Storage::path($storecfg, $drive->{file});
>>>>>            my $dst_path = PVE::Storage::path($storecfg, $newvolid);
>>>>> -        run_command(['qemu-img', 'dd', '-n', '-O', $dst_format,
>>>>> "bs=1", "count=$size",
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        # Ceph doesn't like too small blocksize, see bug #3324
>>>>> +        my $bs = 1;
>>>>> +        while ($bs < $size && $bs < 1024 && $size % $bs == 0) {
>>>>> +            $bs *= 2;
>>>>> +        }
> 
> now, $size % $bs != 0
> 
> I guess this is wrong...
> 

Sorry about the confusion yesterday. Of course you are right.

>>>>> +        my $count = $size / $bs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        run_command(['qemu-img', 'dd', '-n', '-O', $dst_format,
>>>>> "bs=$bs", "count=$count",
>>>>>                "if=$src_path", "of=$dst_path"]);
>>>>>            } else {
>>>>>            qemu_img_convert($drive->{file}, $newvolid, $size,
>>>>> $snapname, $sparseinit);
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel