From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E1B9443F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2D321B544 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0BDDB4406F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:15:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <f66d330d-cc17-0c2c-af55-3000af3ef6ab@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:15:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/109.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20230110093425.106426-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20230110093425.106426-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.288 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu] cherry-pick stable fixes for 7.2 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:15:39 -0000 Am 10/01/2023 um 10:34 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Two for virtio-mem and one for vIOMMU. Both features are not yet > exposed in PVE's qemu-server, but planned to be added. > > Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> > --- > > @Thomas: the migration optimization I mentioned off-list seems to be > just for 'background snapshot', but not relevant for live migration, > so not picking it up. > > ...he-bitmap-index-of-the-section-offse.patch | 44 ++++++ > ...he-iterator-variable-in-a-vmem-rdl_l.patch | 36 +++++ > ...ty-bitmap-syncing-when-vIOMMU-is-ena.patch | 141 ++++++++++++++++++ > debian/patches/series | 3 + > 4 files changed, 224 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0003-virtio-mem-Fix-the-bitmap-index-of-the-section-offse.patch > create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0004-virtio-mem-Fix-the-iterator-variable-in-a-vmem-rdl_l.patch > create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0005-vhost-fix-vq-dirty-bitmap-syncing-when-vIOMMU-is-ena.patch > > applied, thanks!