From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38D966812
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:46:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1A562A1BD
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:45:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 37B232A1AE
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:45:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id m5so8511545wrx.9
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 02:45:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=aFmKzVqVMo8vf5zk2ZgbNXKWutSJ1ErVnWBPFVUDktA=;
b=drrtBdcWLIV9793siOV8LufjMTE0Y4otbE04RzGFNz9Nc1NRXqdhd09kwbaiXk+uiC
sDgpFV2BeJGJ7UKdj2mxDie6/7725UGMgRk3NeiG/ez6MCxqfgkS2IIXah/7Kr/xR9/x
FxAEIBkRBjnYjCKnDNEAtG/sTUdeeHNoN4Czx01VM9y20LafBjqpUXwTW1LJsyvJwB9J
WG/QJoVA/rlOSJ69TIsoeiqHs2hKkCBIl4mvl09XeoCIKOE/IxKpYf12JNsVo8fxN90o
4d2vRmVzOkJnP8R7EuLwJgvg9rxCsjQr1rzpeXs8QoL37BR8gGQydkzLEZOCbmLl3NOM
QF3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=aFmKzVqVMo8vf5zk2ZgbNXKWutSJ1ErVnWBPFVUDktA=;
b=F1mez6TP/SCkJY1iq9NkaDNotuWGKAJA6F6XuIeUIiy5jdop6z80JKUB0cBj9IBwxg
MikzNwDZ3jxKJsbQlndX1WigMOxTmQWKryTSqA7JiIzXVOg8LzolYXOi3TYpPl1RbAup
jOBJJj8OlcmsYH5U4qKo4Om7dvPkkHOizRWKdqMLu6nhMeMvN4DDZN8ajt/YDWkLcb6k
pQb24vmBBu2eF3CB3uveWGsHvHMp4TZ0WxKtxP7vl6T6Gecf/6RtyfUZqo3fEkbsS+vp
eluq27MygQgLtkuzGBAtuxgRPPdqQ8Y4EXM1acD5Cbw0areSiIUFCNNCH4wL6qRVN+bI
fPQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mWmS4cva/c690+nlcLvovlWl/pH2bTHgJB327C+ddURRMjCUD
PCtMenb7hTW2UwTCY4S9+94tM+kagfo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHV3gmzdv/L9+Th6dl/gwlMkQnevGoiHnRs7FL+QBkVJ53QBCeEa1P1lYwyRS2ZXAYF1kgPw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:85:: with SMTP id
m5mr2972700wrx.378.1610102736928;
Fri, 08 Jan 2021 02:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:af10:bae:a0a4:33b7?
([2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:af10:bae:a0a4:33b7])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm12360370wrr.32.2021.01.08.02.45.36
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 08 Jan 2021 02:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <21dec802-c6e8-d395-1444-7b30df5620cd@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
<255b8af8-8834-0f24-d9a6-819f2d2cf8c8@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
<b43df258-4cdb-49f4-5adb-a20188a908df@gmail.com>
<9811d98a-ebf2-8590-ddd0-3b707ede4a4e@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
<ccbcca68-59fc-944e-d90c-c26ae20b17e5@gmail.com>
<cca8ce9d-2de2-3fb5-0522-3b7bb0f4132c@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
<f3ca5f88-5cbd-9807-02d7-d8f24fcbefdb@gmail.com>
<89a1ad57-6f99-d422-08df-d110f10aa3b9@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
<4bdfeb73-582e-2c25-e300-166283e40dc5@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f45c98bd-c37c-4947-9074-705d5ea2b665@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:45:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4bdfeb73-582e-2c25-e300-166283e40dc5@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.200 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
domain
FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
NICE_REPLY_A -0.267 Looks like a legit reply (A)
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [proxmox.com, ceph.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] After update Ceph monitor shows wrong version in UI
and is down and out of quorum
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 10:46:14 -0000
Am 08.01.21 um 11:36 schrieb Frank Thommen:
>
> On 05.01.21 21:17, Frank Thommen wrote:
>> On 05.01.21 21:02, Uwe Sauter wrote:
>>> There's a paragraph about probing mons on
>>>
>>> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-mon/
>>
>> I will check that (tomorrow :-)
>
>
> using the monitor's admin socket on either of the three nodes I can query the monitors of 01 and 03 (the good ones) but
> not of 02 (the problematic one):
>
> root@odcf-pve01:~# ceph tell mon.odcf-pve02 mon_status
> Error ENOENT: problem getting command descriptions from mon.odcf-pve02
> root@odcf-pve01:~#
>
> The monitor daemon is running on all three and the ports are open.
>
> Any other ideas?
You could check the permissions on the socket:
ss -xln | grep ceph-mon
SOCK=$(ss -xln | awk '/ceph-mon/ {print $5}')
ls -la ${SOCK}
On my host, this shows
srwxr-xr-x 1 ceph ceph 0 Dec 20 23:47 /var/run/ceph/ceph-mon.px-alpha-cluster.asok
>
> Cheers, Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>