From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F5D68FCD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:52:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A23FB2253E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:52:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2F78122535
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:52:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0126641B1B;
 Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:52:47 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ef2eba08-870b-7aa4-4a8b-61a7b130a41f@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:52:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/98.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20220310143137.1384472-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <b23eb9cf-c6e2-0ff6-8669-22ff22987c6e@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <b23eb9cf-c6e2-0ff6-8669-22ff22987c6e@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.153 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit] StatusView: fix usage
 calculation for fields without valid values
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 09:52:53 -0000

On 3/11/22 10:13, Matthias Heiserer wrote:
> On 10.03.2022 15:31, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>> Sometimes, total can be zero (e.g. for swap when it's not used), which
>> leads to the usage being NaN. This led to the progressbar not being
>> updated for InfoWidgets, leaving a spurious '0%' as text.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>   src/panel/StatusView.js | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/panel/StatusView.js b/src/panel/StatusView.js
>> index 4a60dae..e2e81e2 100644
>> --- a/src/panel/StatusView.js
>> +++ b/src/panel/StatusView.js
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Ext.define('Proxmox.panel.StatusView', {
>>            */
>>           if (used.used !== undefined &&
>>           used.total !== undefined) {
>> -        return used.used/used.total;
>> +        return used.total > 0 ? used.used/used.total : 0;
>>           }
>>       }
> 
> When used.used or used.total is undefined, the function still returns NaN. Have you considered using 
> the or operator?

that can't happen because of the 'if' check:

'used.used !== undefined && used.total !== undefined'