From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECC87707B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F23D1C157
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E67891C14C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BF3FC458F9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <ec2f2f78-60d7-8b72-c4fb-702c797502aa@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20211021083609.2057094-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
 <20211021083609.2057094-4-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
 <6e264086-e994-0958-a06f-8c1c0a257093@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <6e264086-e994-0958-a06f-8c1c0a257093@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.326 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -2.267 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 3/4] tests: cfg2cmd: add a few q35 related
 tests
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:45:55 -0000

T24gMjEuMTAuMjEgMTE6MzQsIFN0ZWZhbiBSZWl0ZXIgd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiBOb3TCoHRo
YXTCoGl0wqBtYXR0ZXJzwqBtdWNowqBidXTCoEnCoHRoaW5rwqB0aGlzwqB0ZXN0wqBpc8Kg
ZmFpcmx5wqB1c2VsZXNzLMKgd2XCoGFscmVhZHnCoGhhdmXCoHZlcnnCoHNpbWlsYXLCoG9u
ZXPCoHdpdGjCoHRoZcKgJ2hvc3RwY2knwqBxMzXCoGNvbmZpZ3MuwqBNYXnCoGJlwqBnb29k
wqB0b8KgaGF2ZcKgaXTCoGV4cGxpY2l0wqB0aG91Z2guLi4NCg0KdGhhdCdzIHRoZSBpZGVh
IDopDQo=