From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <aderumier@odiso.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E69965CAA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 43B091D221 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1A3981D215 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:42:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id e25so19041160wme.0 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kU9ahBLBIP3E9LCVoDCamcUutj3AHK2XmLNGizLZ2ng=; b=QWTx/qI0emxG7duwMGVXOd4UuZS+RFrY2vvA9bvV8ciigjaTS4Pru3k2njt8vL3koc kK8hyfJy7urnbASMdKDdIDDQaHmbnKZoCW0p/3Jj5gLHnXsy5qNGj941RmXeI/05fObC sT/Hhv70GsXwYUWcOUtl0UzU+zKkvvUZNh+uy4iXF5bKHkGnGTrpcRLsnj2H+FwZOcxS 6XisNNu5ydRyyMBB6YD1TwKercdBmValXoEXFBmHVZVMOLV8+M89UX4gCGQyHN/khfd2 j6vYGMwpwdtM9lOWd/XynHlps332e4OnkpjVUt2W/OmywwRYGxoaSOMxo/Yj8akT9+DM 6Ctg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kU9ahBLBIP3E9LCVoDCamcUutj3AHK2XmLNGizLZ2ng=; b=SddLCSBnwzymuAHPv8OsTp66WSJO+/ksJTWo5NBIXkhAG/8xPpzYSw3TXpE6Xorc+u zV3Xj6ihJil8GZdOCoDunU6WJJzyYaOrwAbaI16fSXM+6MVXutuJRVt6bvbuGy1OwrKT oUgWfs+fjAXJVH11bVw0kIu/EBgjwNItgmtsXXOro3pVnrkCN3qulvq1goaiobpyJVra MlVhLGnfO8mQQLgaSG5FyMULj1ny7Tw99WwSPJvmruPqXva5X3NQVR0Q4CD7bH0S07Xh 6NY9kdEhH7RXTfDAk7DMIwFRTMVVuAgnFOOgdFUEWAbbwMnFPCm9mxRXkun5f8NFmtWF Q3dA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uccztNW/k39024VkzV+X2WaqDvZdPJh1QMmW2rHAIsy4cUPhe 46p+8oUW7SzHLgUJOrLSYGMW0Ticv7H1VF2G X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3//Jg53F56NOuLGu+vU0M0G6gfkugFKUceiHWDGw2i9C6fVfWwnGiUjZjAHZV09dwDnA19g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2f17:: with SMTP id r23mr26455557wmn.157.1609760528547; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.59.100.50] (globalOdiso.M6Lille.odiso.net. [89.248.211.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r15sm88986643wrq.1.2021.01.04.03.42.07 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <e9a9874b577c12800900e01258d6c7ae40f98e13.camel@odiso.com> From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:42:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <ad3ce1ff-d638-cf80-7715-c7482d935b91@oderland.se> References: <CAPEXuiwNr3OjBh9ArMiBToVAD6EXf5Rp+Ph7OswvAkmFWPmUwg@mail.gmail.com> <ad3ce1ff-d638-cf80-7715-c7482d935b91@oderland.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.817 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 11:42:18 -0000 Hi, currently phpipam && netbox are already implemented (+internal pve ipam for small setup) :) I'm going to send new patch serie soon. (currently working on tests units) Le mardi 29 décembre 2020 à 15:22 +0100, Josef Johansson a écrit : > AFAIK both phpIPAM and NetBox should be supported as IPAM. > > On 12/9/20 8:01 PM, Bruce Wainer wrote: > > Hello, > > In your new SDN environment, are there plans for a plugin for > > phpIPAM? If > > not, can you provide any starting points for developing one? > > Thank you, > > Bruce Wainer > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-devel mailing list > > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >