From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <tsabolov@t8.ru> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EBAB612C1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:16:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C122300F0 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:15:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay161.nicmail.ru (relay161.nicmail.ru [91.189.117.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 060C9300DF for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:15:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.28.138.151] (port=23146 helo=[192.168.8.155]) by relay.hosting.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from <tsabolov@t8.ru>) id 1nFvcm-0000C6-5B for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 13:15:28 +0300 Received: from [62.105.41.93] (account tsabolov@t8.ru HELO [192.168.8.155]) by incarp1103.int.hosting.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1nFvcm-0003rB-HK for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 13:15:28 +0300 Message-ID: <e97b4099-4241-890d-3d72-790b1f7e66c5@t8.ru> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 13:15:28 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= <tsabolov@t8.ru> X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Auth: dkim=none X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] ceph osd tree & destroy_cephfs X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:16:07 -0000 Hi to all. In my Proxmox Cluster with 7 node I try to change some Pgs, Target Ratio and some Target size on some pool. MAX AVAIL on important pool not changed, I think if I destroy 2 pool on ceph is changed. I read the instructions https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pveceph.html#_destroy_cephfs , I need ask if I destroy CephFS pool is will affect other pools ? For now I not have there some data not used it for backup or something other data. For now I have : ceph df --- RAW STORAGE --- CLASS SIZE AVAIL USED RAW USED %RAW USED hdd 106 TiB 98 TiB 8.0 TiB 8.1 TiB 7.58 TOTAL 106 TiB 98 TiB 8.0 TiB 8.1 TiB 7.58 --- POOLS --- POOL ID PGS STORED OBJECTS USED %USED MAX AVAIL device_health_metrics 1 1 16 MiB 22 32 MiB 0 46 TiB vm.pool 2 512 2.7 TiB 740.12k 8.0 TiB 7.99 31 TiB cephfs_data 3 32 1.9 KiB 0 3.8 KiB 0 46 TiB cephfs_metadata 4 2 23 MiB 28 47 MiB 0 46 TiB And one other question below is my ceph osd tree, like you see some osd the REWEIGHT is less the default 1.00000 Suggest me how I change the REWEIGHT on this osd? ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF -1 106.43005 root default -13 14.55478 host pve3101 10 hdd 7.27739 osd.10 up 1.00000 1.00000 11 hdd 7.27739 osd.11 up 1.00000 1.00000 -11 14.55478 host pve3103 8 hdd 7.27739 osd.8 up 1.00000 1.00000 9 hdd 7.27739 osd.9 up 1.00000 1.00000 -3 14.55478 host pve3105 0 hdd 7.27739 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000 1 hdd 7.27739 osd.1 up 1.00000 1.00000 -5 14.55478 host pve3107 * 2 hdd 7.27739 osd.2 up 0.95001 1.00000* 3 hdd 7.27739 osd.3 up 1.00000 1.00000 -9 14.55478 host pve3108 6 hdd 7.27739 osd.6 up 1.00000 1.00000 7 hdd 7.27739 osd.7 up 1.00000 1.00000 -7 14.55478 host pve3109 4 hdd 7.27739 osd.4 up 1.00000 1.00000 5 hdd 7.27739 osd.5 up 1.00000 1.00000 -15 19.10138 host pve3111 12 hdd 10.91409 osd.12 up 1.00000 1.00000 * 13 hdd 0.90970 osd.13 up 0.76846 1.00000* 14 hdd 0.90970 osd.14 up 1.00000 1.00000 15 hdd 0.90970 osd.15 up 1.00000 1.00000 16 hdd 0.90970 osd.16 up 1.00000 1.00000 17 hdd 0.90970 osd.17 up 1.00000 1.00000 * 18 hdd 0.90970 osd.18 up 0.75006 1.00000* 19 hdd 0.90970 osd.19 up 1.00000 1.00000 20 hdd 0.90970 osd.20 up 1.00000 1.00000 21 hdd 0.90970 osd.21 up 1.00000 1.00000 Sergey TS The best Regard _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user