From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C9879748
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1E4CF4C2
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E3700F4B7
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC3E045C1C
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <11c22442-2494-4fc5-6622-4968b50b6966@marcobertorello.it>
<651b6824-4023-2726-5d2d-8f969853e9c5@proxmox.com>
<407c5765-770d-6597-c1f1-19e78723ddd8@marcobertorello.it>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <e90e3cbd-b94e-9439-602f-70cabded7fd9@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:55:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <407c5765-770d-6597-c1f1-19e78723ddd8@marcobertorello.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.365 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -0.215 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Container exceed disk size
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:56:02 -0000
Am 27.10.21 um 09:31 schrieb Bertorello, Marco:
>
> Il 27/10/2021 09:13, Fabian Ebner ha scritto:
>> Hi,
> Hi Fabian, thanks for your reply!
>> did you do anything special when setting up this container? What does
> no, I created it as usual, from the WebUI
I'm not able to reproduce the issue here. Could you share the output of
zpool history | grep subvol-119
?
>> zfs get refquota zp1/subvol-119-disk-0
> it was set to none
>> output? If it's not 8G, you should be able to fix it using
>> zfs set refquota=8G zp1/subvol-119-disk-0
>
> Thanks a lot, this fixed!
>
> may thanks!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>