From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D084768F5A
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB4EF19B2A
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7D40719B1D
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 40F714622C
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <e7c4d9bb-9ee3-a5a0-dd9b-88c5c1ce6be8@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20210202130317.31873-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
 <20210202130317.31873-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210202130317.31873-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pmg-devel] applied: [PATCH pmg-api v3 2/2] utils: allow '/' inside
 email address localpart
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:15:43 -0000

On 02.02.21 14:03, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> The change is motivated by a report in our community forum [0], where
> a mail addressed to an address containing '/' in its local-part ended
> up in the quarantine.
> This is permitted by RFC5322 ([1]), and, probably more relevant,
> happily accepted and processed by postfix.
> 
> Once inside the quarantine (or the statistic database) the records cannot
> be displayed (due to the parameter verification failure).
> 
> This leaves the user unable to delete the quarantined mail.
> 
> Apart from the quarantine and statistics the 'pmg-email-address'
> format is only used in the PBSConfig and the fetchmail configuration
> (both of which are available only to the admin and can be still be
> edited irrespective of the set localpart).
> 
> [0]
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pmg-error-parameter-verification-failed-400.82353/
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PMG/Utils.pm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!