From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4BA73494
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BAC3018630
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0844718623
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C23C243B9A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e63d495a-cfb2-3e79-bb2b-a7eae2a0d67a@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210414122431.607305-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <7a633f6c-6295-16ec-8329-9775b7b36c3f@proxmox.com>
 <20210415094430.GA25302@gaia.proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210415094430.GA25302@gaia.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.291 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [linuxcontainers.org]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH lxcfs] bump version to 4.0.7-pve1
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:47:52 -0000

On 15.04.21 11:44, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> hi,
> 
>> please ensure that your git-send-email does not picks up S-b, R-b, etc. git trailers
>> of patches by patches and wrongly CC's those people like happened here.
> oops sorry about that.
> 
>> Further, separate debian/changelog entries from the actual changes, in general
>> rather not send updates to debian/changelog.
>>
>> It would be also good to have a short summary of changes/fixes/features from that
>> new release, i.e., why should be update (what's fixed, or what's changed and thus
>> a potential regression?)...
> it's a minor release and the main highlight is the improvements in swap behavior
> consistency.
> 
> basically the previously cherry-picked patches for some swap
> and memory improvements are now merged upstream.
> 
> https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/lxcfs-4-0-7-lts-has-been-released/9893
> 

So this has basically zero value... I'd like to avoid generating work by just
redoing a release with the exact state we have already build and released in
December 2020...