From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BDCC576
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 14:59:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9275E29A11
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 14:59:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 14:59:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CE954409FF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 14:59:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e54fa664-16a6-043f-7e17-018a7b9e038d@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:59:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
References: <20230615141445.188274-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
 <20230615141445.188274-4-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230615141445.188274-4-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.091 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [lxc.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 container 3/4]: add 'pbs-entries-max'
 parameter
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 12:59:36 -0000

Am 15.06.23 um 16:14 schrieb Alexander Zeidler:
> configuring pbs-entries-max can avoid failing backups due to a high
> amount of files in folders where a folder exclusion is not possible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> Reword loginfo message and include new set value
> Fix indentation
> 
> 
>  src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm
> index 5783ffa..a9e0ffb 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm
> @@ -395,6 +395,11 @@ sub archive {
>  	push @$param, '--backup-id', $vmid;
>  	push @$param, '--backup-time', $task->{backup_time};
>  
> +	if ($opts->{"pbs-entries-max"}) {
It's part of performance now so this doesn't work.

Style nit: you can write
if (my $foo = $bar->{"too-long-to-read-and-type-each-time"}) {
and then just use $foo instead :)

> +	    push @$param, '--entries-max', $opts->{"pbs-entries-max"};
> +	    $self->loginfo("set max number of entries in memory for file-based backups to $opts->{'pbs-entries-max'}");

Style nit: line longer than 100 characters

> +	}
> +
>  	my @storage = ($opts->{scfg}, $opts->{storage});
>  
>  	my $logfunc = sub { my $line = shift; $self->loginfo($line) };