From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FD21FF183
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 May 2025 14:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DCC6318544;
	Wed, 21 May 2025 14:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <de11b26b-c82a-43c2-a748-742fd9229780@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 14:36:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20250430104543.272091-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250430104543.272091-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [params.storage]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix #4166: restore: add resource
 pool selector
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 30.04.25 um 12:45 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval:
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/window/Restore.js | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/www/manager6/window/Restore.js b/www/manager6/window/Restore.js
> index 22900868..8d6dfabe 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/window/Restore.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/window/Restore.js
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Restore', {
>  	    if (values.storage) {
>  		params.storage = values.storage;
>  	    }
> +	    if (values.pool) {
> +		params.pool = values.pool;
> +	    }
>  
>  	    ['bwlimit', 'cores', 'name', 'memory', 'sockets'].forEach(opt => {
>  		if ((values[opt] ?? '') !== '') {
> @@ -186,6 +189,13 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Restore', {
>  		fieldLabel: gettext('Source'),
>  	    },
>  	    storagesel,
> +	    {
> +		xtype: 'pvePoolSelector',
> +		fieldLabel: gettext('Resource Pool'),
> +		name: 'pool',
> +		value: '',
> +		allowBlank: true,

In case of an in-place restore, the pool option does not have any
effect, so the selector should be hidden. And pre-existing, but the
backend should print a message/warning that the parameter is ignored.

> +	    },
>  	    {
>  		xtype: 'pmxDisplayEditField',
>  		name: 'vmid',



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel