From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <aderumier@odiso.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941DD6B000 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8794418908 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C48E0188FA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:33:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id 91so4514068wrj.7 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:33:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=qPb1kRS7MPA6rZCGc+QBdHIEVV7DCWRSENYMNEYzt+w=; b=z0d+kasIhXVSUzgDi8b9QMdvj6rddMuRPSonHDQBd/IyJwzGYO3SX6BGiGYNsKLk36 LTJH6DuBvKgvNT+9Bu96V32jEI37SSxC2uHBmE5z2xJ5uuCzK8ZLbXlFHcpDB+MQRPY0 ywCC0X79mE2HFu3GKORzwgnHNYstXST5lmefj052uceymkRvngyE1lZqSVMzydqrO+KJ EDcK1TtlstSRe1LTlUsEOCWTEu19orGYHjywqxowwdP4Ed9vnjaKZkmcZDXeKJcwLdI8 1UnI5Bz0BhdLQh7QeOXFkBSXFusumb6jCHKwwDm88cgG5PRG/2NmG6t9JTgl+UAToUC1 vslw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=qPb1kRS7MPA6rZCGc+QBdHIEVV7DCWRSENYMNEYzt+w=; b=ZdWWkVPEpRRD2siTUMihLUEtVTiz1U0R5kGNA57mwWRFSbN5+YYjLMGPKLkjR6sSlE GAU2vINQuWsXRU0bgUHy+3IzEvnhXAoL2JRBYG5zMY0rOHRMUP6jvBkckxZ16JNINvfK P/CX/kmwbPoDHQxMLEy/Euva+x1UNiwziIga7aw3GEvUSsVErCCPUXNW6zxlgjBOqpXw 8ZVTnYXnY4ghckP+iW7S9mKrFL7ty8PLcnczdSF5G6/vzhzzueUGs1AW794jBId385E7 tKA5UtuO2j/lvwvvrino0l/pAXm4CDibxJO3p3V4XIUfa4cUh0YKWcbzegUvCtDwB059 yuxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315lhavRX2ecDwMWo31H9xyrqKRIKa5k/azKdTGxWS9oS0MQls5 WOBLa6605gbRy7F+fte7yjBGILAP22mLwb4wbTw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDHLwVNTa5jwjFQvdJgskyzxFkRC5ESxFjdyVpGIRow8kE1I7DNwpDiJqFw5LdGVFAxpCM2w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f78e:: with SMTP id q14mr1683786wrp.320.1607589191073; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:33:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x25sm7588581wmc.3.2020.12.10.00.33.09 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:33:10 -0800 (PST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <CAPEXuiwNr3OjBh9ArMiBToVAD6EXf5Rp+Ph7OswvAkmFWPmUwg@mail.gmail.com> From: alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com> Message-ID: <dba3eab5-6b50-a235-8f62-c07c0827f45c@odiso.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:33:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <CAPEXuiwNr3OjBh9ArMiBToVAD6EXf5Rp+Ph7OswvAkmFWPmUwg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:33:18 -0000 Hi, phpIPAM is already implemented :) (currently phpIPAM && netbox) On 09/12/2020 20:01, Bruce Wainer wrote: > Hello, > In your new SDN environment, are there plans for a plugin for phpIPAM? If > not, can you provide any starting points for developing one? > Thank you, > Bruce Wainer > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >