From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <piviul@riminilug.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B06728AA
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B66982801B
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 6.mo7.mail-out.ovh.net (6.mo7.mail-out.ovh.net [188.165.39.218])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0443428011
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from player794.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.103.118])
 by mo7.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D0719EC65
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from riminilug.it (host-79-7-69-158.business.telecomitalia.it
 [79.7.69.158]) (Authenticated sender: piviul@riminilug.it)
 by player794.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C915C19E7FC6C
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
 (GARM-99G0035e5595e4-3453-4c9c-a23b-0a99ef1e5922,
 CDEB2A25AF39A537C598A742E51F32E21BE5CBF1) smtp.auth=piviul@riminilug.it
X-OVh-ClientIp: 79.7.69.158
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Piviul <piviul@riminilug.it>
Message-ID: <d9bce6e0-d6ba-7492-d335-30a49950e06a@riminilug.it>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:05:05 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5814991545634378782
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefvhffukffffgggtgfgsehtkeertddtfeelnecuhfhrohhmpefrihhvihhulhcuoehpihhvihhulhesrhhimhhinhhilhhughdrihhtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetjedvveeffeetfffhvddujeelueefvdelhfeluddvgeejffevveehtefgkeekffenucffohhmrghinhepphhrohigmhhogidrtghomhenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpjeelrdejrdeiledrudehkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejleegrdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhivhhiuhhlsehrihhmihhnihhluhhgrdhithdprhgtphhtthhopehpvhgvqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdrphhrohigmhhogidrtghomh
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3       0.001 Good reputation (+3)
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL       0.001 Mailspike good senders
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: [PVE-User] Edit: Boot Order mask
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:44:13 -0000

I ask[¹] about this little problem on the forum but nobody found a 
solution, so I try here...

In my PVE the mask where I can change the Boot Order options of a VM is 
not ever the same. If I access to the mask from 2 nodes (say node1 and 
node2) the mask is a simple html form with only combo boxes. On the 
third node (say node3) the mask is more sophisticated, can support the 
drag and drop, has checkbox... in other word it's different. So I would 
like to know why my three nodes doesn't have the same mask even if they 
are at the same proxmox version and if there is a way that all nodes 
shows the same mask.

I ask you because this is not only a layout problem; if I modify the 
boot order options from the node3, I can see strange chars in the PVE 
gui of the other two nodes but if I configure the boot order options 
from node1 or node2 all seems works flawless.

Best regards

Piviul

[¹] 
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/strange-chars-in-boot-order-options.87169/