From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <piviul@riminilug.it> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B06728AA for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B66982801B for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 6.mo7.mail-out.ovh.net (6.mo7.mail-out.ovh.net [188.165.39.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0443428011 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from player794.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.103.118]) by mo7.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D0719EC65 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from riminilug.it (host-79-7-69-158.business.telecomitalia.it [79.7.69.158]) (Authenticated sender: piviul@riminilug.it) by player794.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C915C19E7FC6C for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-99G0035e5595e4-3453-4c9c-a23b-0a99ef1e5922, CDEB2A25AF39A537C598A742E51F32E21BE5CBF1) smtp.auth=piviul@riminilug.it X-OVh-ClientIp: 79.7.69.158 To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> From: Piviul <piviul@riminilug.it> Message-ID: <d9bce6e0-d6ba-7492-d335-30a49950e06a@riminilug.it> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:05:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5814991545634378782 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefvhffukffffgggtgfgsehtkeertddtfeelnecuhfhrohhmpefrihhvihhulhcuoehpihhvihhulhesrhhimhhinhhilhhughdrihhtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetjedvveeffeetfffhvddujeelueefvdelhfeluddvgeejffevveehtefgkeekffenucffohhmrghinhepphhrohigmhhogidrtghomhenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpjeelrdejrdeiledrudehkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejleegrdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhivhhiuhhlsehrihhmihhnihhluhhgrdhithdprhgtphhtthhopehpvhgvqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdrphhrohigmhhogidrtghomh X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [PVE-User] Edit: Boot Order mask X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:44:13 -0000 I ask[¹] about this little problem on the forum but nobody found a solution, so I try here... In my PVE the mask where I can change the Boot Order options of a VM is not ever the same. If I access to the mask from 2 nodes (say node1 and node2) the mask is a simple html form with only combo boxes. On the third node (say node3) the mask is more sophisticated, can support the drag and drop, has checkbox... in other word it's different. So I would like to know why my three nodes doesn't have the same mask even if they are at the same proxmox version and if there is a way that all nodes shows the same mask. I ask you because this is not only a layout problem; if I modify the boot order options from the node3, I can see strange chars in the PVE gui of the other two nodes but if I configure the boot order options from node1 or node2 all seems works flawless. Best regards Piviul [¹] https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/strange-chars-in-boot-order-options.87169/