From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E85696BF
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:57:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B2A328017
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:56:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A0B642800A
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:56:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id h19so1661498edb.9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:56:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:reply-to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=1lGjcBuaMS87fkydusNCxxUJ3t2yV+JpGfaGwuxf5/c=;
 b=IQpsGV4oaE/ioLLA3N7YtSa7hK+LHFxXUi0LOcNk+64zydf2JVJf/5mhcxUF5TMThl
 1nnIQyOuMamVidoynIwU5MZF14tZLKi6EUYtUCUgzTPQcu6KFifye0PLIucMCSAXwnQ4
 Ex61rPB/Uy1nSJDrNIm/3PcDRjfCR7E6Menx2vZrh2iMizx2HwjHai0GiYk5UuIM6Fjs
 ufT9Whb9O6tDLmXsLYuMppkZ3FBcVF6eKs5iMtYJbOYN6nUt7zW7VcKswHrjtwne89fc
 UfDOZUEjUapUpuMEjhOynvWwsxEbHdXJ/5HiqQc5cPXtfc0RrlzAsvtkfW4MR+OBRoCB
 1bfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:reply-to:from:subject:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=1lGjcBuaMS87fkydusNCxxUJ3t2yV+JpGfaGwuxf5/c=;
 b=p253bL2ip+nu4ci/HLGprPW7mrrdUnQB3BLt7nbV9Ra2bpiid2kV1FqQwuKE8MgZ5q
 2hXvm2xd+P5yD8Kw/700Z4kcuduyirDv+InxdqAGdwFJBCVdPaqCfNyPa1WsMN+fo/xV
 U5PHrazKvg8mSdAq8FSdOOwHCY3vqaqY5XlcNgelo1jYAQPT+8/l5HNzBFWdj6JpMNik
 a190xh5nnjEiBVhp8tyWEv6RXxTphDWdKUdxR9r3BasqXQI/23y6q5FdCOivAd7kH6bO
 EYp5wC7gaeoXiXx/YOzDRSBgCCUrhYVRayi4l4gZsWnRaGfRUkJNryhn+TVrNF1B2fhK
 wAAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bgUOb+cvWJ7osXdO5/1emgdxb9yA2/7XDf7es/0vcgwqdCPQn
 296nEH/9yl3YiXezGQFtmsFvvNaLy4M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9kemaN29j6N5wCViqOz2ad91gRmJk9U9FfQE0KBAZ2BLhMbJ9e/tY7mKygplP9X9Ob8Youw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d38b:: with SMTP id x11mr32151163edq.23.1614160611461; 
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a396:f000:5605:dbff:fe76:161d?
 ([2a02:8070:a396:f000:5605:dbff:fe76:161d])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p25sm1086341eds.55.2021.02.24.01.56.50
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:56:51 -0800 (PST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com
From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d95acf82-c3c1-b94d-4f49-3e01d54d6894@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:56:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [PVE-User] =?utf-8?q?Update_to_ZFS_2_available_=E2=80=93_breaks_?=
 =?utf-8?q?dependencies?=
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:57:28 -0000

Hi all,

since yesterday, 2021-02-23, updates for ZFS 2.0.3 are available.
Currently my systems have 0.8.5 installed. When trying to update using aptitude I get a popup reading:

###################
Some packages were broken and have been fixed:

Keep the following packages at their current version:
libnvpair2linux [Not Installed]
libuutil2linux [Not Installed]
libzfs3linux [Not Installed]
libzpool3linux [Not Installed]
zfs-initramfs [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)]
zfs-zed [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)]
zfsutils-linux [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)]
###################

Could someone advice (possible from Proxmox team) advice on how to apply the updates in this
particular situation?


Regards,

	Uwe