From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DFF77FEC for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:49:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 97BA417DCA for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:49:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CCEE817DC3 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2so2755934wrn.0 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kZ6nrUhf/69PARoyeYBXImpQ6dADe95b04JcfyZbgJs=; b=hG+R/fy6QCinlreQz5j4x3ybUgn051HcR18XlAZ/TWZ/jrydHSgpw7DBbDJiwINBWw tvAfaFzMi+xf+fsGb6duoQXNZ4PV85CwYtKeucevgd/7nnskZ816AmCDu7l9GqseJdfz 1am+Zv5NDnKYF/e0jwjvkta9ExMNDGDSO5xk8FmYW45+kYfOL5aC9ot9Ky2vmjBhTNRC YvNF1rCH+IlzCpqsoTzXDUOMhU0oWOF5lLTZ+2tqr4gLRdiGFyr70DnJTYXwHiQgBaEg 4lW2+k+lMVaXU3tjccxjZYoVNVgYLIbcoyvM6fApbR2xsrtxGewztWCCXtwsVX6XmgZT OC5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kZ6nrUhf/69PARoyeYBXImpQ6dADe95b04JcfyZbgJs=; b=qm/xSYi1QrRnKBRW82bH+vBLkMlatLyzsK70isPBQillCfttA2nMPfb1VyFt1bJV4Z 9Jhpe25ROCAhQl7CSyJQhzunoZiHwzpnFwWxAS9wLYOj8pZ70Vt7QVaslx3z7LxTZJ8N xPEqLEE8Sngfol98Mufq96wUb+O+tBPLvrAI0Vq/cwZoHrT39stWKTDgkUuV4DzcfWbc tDL2G7FrLflaEOGqEzCroUn0jtHa3VlnWb35cW79MAB76UK4YoJlLG+DiZiHDgITMEEb uqwHyVWUs/APlcyuEoCsREt9wtkAn+YhacTkX7A5WcV8OxyL5HN1vcKFSpXjlgV2tYTI DdXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gMP3gXIguD7D9ukXXmap+eQjQw105/6meu3l8G9Vt1X83rK41 G502W8Zi8ZkZRzjhRddz7ysOkqiETtk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzwyTlYbgZoXI/u8nAfk1E/FiiVcxiE/M7DiWDAaFdUCZMFPgMyIbzfeuyhOTgmlr8bkoFtA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a183:: with SMTP id u3mr42695481wru.175.1626882559452; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o3sm27419556wrm.5.2021.07.21.08.49.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: Gilberto Ferreira , Proxmox VE user list References: From: Uwe Sauter Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:49:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.371 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:49:27 -0000 Hi Gilberto, thanks for that tip. Unfortunately the network configuration quits a few steps before the bridge is configured. The needed bond0 is not created… Regards, Uwe Am 21.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: > Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface file: > > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change > > > > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:18, Uwe Sauter > escreveu: > > Hi all, > > Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. > > It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces using LCAP. > > Output from "ip a": > 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 >     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 >     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >     inet6 ::1/128 scope host >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master vmbr1224 state UP group default > qlen 1000 >     link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >     altname enp24s0f0 > 3: enp59s0f4: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 >     link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >     inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 4: enp59s0f4d1: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 >     link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >     inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 5: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 >     link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >     altname enp24s0f1 > 6: ibp94s0: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >     link/infiniband 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > 7: ibp94s0d1: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >     link/infiniband 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > 8: vmbr1224: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default > qlen 1000 >     link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >     inet 10.224.203.1/16 scope global vmbr1224 >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >     inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > > My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges for the VMs: > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eno1 > iface eno1 inet manual > > auto enp59s0f4 > iface enp59s0f4 inet manual >   mtu 9000 > > auto enp59s0f4d1 > iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual >   mtu 9000 > > auto bond0 > iface bond0 inet manual >   slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 >   bond-downdelay 200 >   bond-miimon 100 >   bond-mode 802.3ad >   bond-updelay 200 > > auto vmbr1224 > iface vmbr1224 inet static >   address 10.224.203.1 >   netmask 255.255.0.0 >   gateway 10.224.200.1 >   bridge_ports eno1 >   bridge_stp off >   bridge_fd 0 > > ##  # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 > ##  auto vmbr155 > ##  iface vmbr155 inet manual > ##    mtu 9000 > ##    bridge_ports bond0 > ##    bridge_stp off > ##    bridge_fd 0 > > > This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same host which experienced a SSD > failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. > > > Am I missing something? Am I being blind? > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > Thanks, > >         Uwe > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >