From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62ABF7443F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5732BCD61
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:05:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E40E7CD54
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACF8B4213A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <d4083145-45db-9b1b-cbbc-8f7ffd126aea@proxmox.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:05:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210322143243.6606-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20210322143243.6606-4-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210322143243.6606-4-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server 4/4] filter by content type
 when using vdisk_list
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 16:06:17 -0000

On 22.03.21 15:32, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> except for migration, where it would be subtly backwards-incompatible. Since
> there is a scan_volids call for migration, we can't default to filtering in
> scan_volids just yet.
> 
> Also allows to get rid of the existing filtering hack in rescan().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Dependency bump for pve-storage is needed.
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, with d/control bump for pve-storage thanks!