From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426591FF13A for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 17:19:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CF5715E41; Wed, 13 May 2026 17:19:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:19:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server v3 3/3] fix #7119: qm cleanup: wait for process exiting for up to 30 seconds From: Fiona Ebner To: Dominik Csapak , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260226140752.1792378-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20260226140752.1792378-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <6e5aaa63-60ce-4d8c-806d-b13f68327e8e@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <6e5aaa63-60ce-4d8c-806d-b13f68327e8e@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778685568175 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: USC767PWMWFZMTT5TDODJLURBMUSJNI4 X-Message-ID-Hash: USC767PWMWFZMTT5TDODJLURBMUSJNI4 X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 13.05.26 um 5:14 PM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 26.02.26 um 3:08 PM schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> + die "vm still running after timeout - aborting cleanup\n" if $pid; Oh, and I would reformulate this to something like "aborting cleanup, because VM is still running after $timeout seconds\n" to mention which operation failed up front.