From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC056CE0C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Feb 2021 06:12:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0865A15C00
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Feb 2021 06:11:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A176C15BF5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Feb 2021 06:11:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72D8741AAF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 Feb 2021 06:11:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <d22ea925-3051-55ed-1454-c56e230549f6@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:11:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210201142131.30024-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <20210201142131.30024-4-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <7c94f976-633e-7126-1d90-e4efbcfa1612@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <7c94f976-633e-7126-1d90-e4efbcfa1612@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.178 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/7] ui: qemu/HardwareView: eslint:
 enforce "no-useless-concat" rule
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 05:12:17 -0000

T24gMDIuMDIuMjEgMTQ6MDYsIERvbWluaWsgQ3NhcGFrIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBpJ2TCoHByZWZl
csKgd2XCoHVzZcKgdGVtcGxhdGXCoHN0cmluZ3PCoGlmwqB3ZcKgdG91Y2jCoHRoaXPCoGxp
bmUNCj4gdGhpc8KgY291bGTCoGJlDQo+IA0KPiBgL2FwaTIvanNvbi9ub2Rlcy8ke25vZGVu
YW1lfS9xZW11LyR7dm1pZH0vcGVuZGluZ2ANCg0KKzENCg==