From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381FA69A26 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:49:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25B38B9BD for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:48:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AF130B9B2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:48:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7F9A144811 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:48:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <d0e1e314-eff9-4a69-3e49-eb72135e07f6@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:48:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/93.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Lorenz Stechauner <l.stechauner@proxmox.com>, Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com> References: <20210913160036.148321-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com> <20210913160036.148321-2-d.whyte@proxmox.com> <7ed50f2c-79bd-c041-c996-66219550c3ea@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <7ed50f2c-79bd-c041-c996-66219550c3ea@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.257 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.969 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs 2/2] pmxcfs: add more config files and discuss symlinks X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:49:20 -0000 On 14.09.21 09:50, Lorenz Stechauner wrote: > On 13.09.21 18:00, Dylan Whyte wrote: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Symbolic links >> =C2=A0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> =C2=A0 +Certain directories within the cluster file system use symboli= c links, in order >> +to point to a node's own configuration files. Thus, the files pointed= to in the >> +table below refer to different files on each node of the cluster. >> + >> =C2=A0 [width=3D"100%",cols=3D"m,m"] >> =C2=A0 |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> =C2=A0 |`local`=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | `nod= es/<LOCAL_HOST_NAME>` > maybe the /etc/pve/openvz symlink should be added to this list as well?= >=20 mixed feelings about this one, we'll drop that probably quite soon. Need = to reevaluate breakage potential, but just dropping the link should be close to zero, so it can = be possible that we do not wait out for the next major release. Anyhow, if it would be added then a "depreacated, removed soon" should be= added