From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD9C6ADC8
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:30:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7DFE720A07
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[212.186.127.180])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2393F209FA
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D344F419C4
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:30:07 +0100 (CET)
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210216170710.31767-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
<20210216170710.31767-16-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
<38278034.3068.1613557520535@webmail.proxmox.com>
From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <d06c4bd3-708f-4120-e7ad-b732441d0de3@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:30:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38278034.3068.1613557520535@webmail.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 15/22] file-restore-daemon:
add binary with virtio-vsock API server
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:30:38 -0000
On 17/02/2021 11:25, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> Since the REST server implementation uses the log!() macro, we can
>> redirect its output to stdout by registering env_logger as the logging
>> target. env_logger is already in our dependency tree via zstd/bindgen.
>
> Initializing the syslog crate should be enough:
>
> if let Err(err) = syslog::init(
> syslog::Facility::LOG_DAEMON,
> log::LevelFilter::Info,
> Some("file-restore-daemon")) {
> bail!("unable to inititialize syslog - {}", err);
> }
>
Wouldn't the syslog crate depend on the systemd journal though? Or does
it fall back to stdout/stderr?