From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF18A1706 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:40:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F283023390 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:40:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A99C24570F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:40:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <cd7289fb-20b1-71b5-4760-009a82ddb0c5@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:40:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20230411134018.1699848-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20230411134018.1699848-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.098 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 manager 0/3]fix 2515 use size defaults X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:40:45 -0000 ping? On 4/11/23 15:40, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > The main goal of this series is to improve the handling of configured > default size & min_size values when creating a new Ceph Pool in the GUI. > > A new Ceph API endpoint, 'cfg/value', is added. It allows us to fetch > values for config keys that are set either in the config DB of Ceph or > in the ceph.conf file. > > changes since v2: > * API rework has been already applied > * cleaned up JS code to set default values right where we get them from > the API instead of at multiple places in the CephPoolInputPanel > itself. > > Aaron Lauterer (3): > api: ceph: add endpoint to fetch config keys > fix #2515: ui: ceph pool create: use configured defaults for size and > min_size > ui: ceph pool edit: rework with controller and formulas > > PVE/API2/Ceph/Cfg.pm | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >