From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03AFF1FF165 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:27:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C54E43C3C0; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:28:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta From: Thomas Lamprecht To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Christian Ebner References: <20250731104814.99768-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <598b090d-e4d4-4697-af73-0413cdc53546@proxmox.com> <96e0fd7f-a258-4ad9-b0de-8f3774ea5870@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <96e0fd7f-a258-4ad9-b0de-8f3774ea5870@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753968519400 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{, -backup} v3 00/10] s3: implement list buckets and use bucket selector for datastore creation X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" Am 31.07.25 um 15:17 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Am 31.07.25 um 15:02 schrieb Christian Ebner: >> superseded-by version 4: >> https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/DBQ7YRTZE0NV.LM0ZMFK4WZR1@proxmox.com/T/ > > I already pushed the s3 changes and just finished building the PBS one, > can I get follow-ups please? Maybe a bit more context, given that Lukas comments where mostly developer experience related and signaled a positive review and me having taken a slightly closer look at v2 already and testing was positive I started to push this out, and when I almost was done with uploading and pushing the PBS to git your v4 came in. FWICT it's no user facing changes where included compared to this v3, and the test worked out nice as I could get my buckets from both Cloudflare R2 as also Hetzner S3, nice UX improvement. In anyway, I just wanted to explicitly clarify that I really have no high priority for the code improvements, as previous reply might be understood differently. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel