From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A00E620D4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 078F82B98C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6C2CC2B97F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:55:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2856F43398
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:55:36 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20200812100127.29722-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20200812100127.29722-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <c9af32c8-9781-03f8-880b-b7730bef7028@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:55:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/80.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200812100127.29722-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.612 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.361 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [qemuserver.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH/RFC v2 qemu-server 2/3] restore_vma_archive:
 get rid of oldtimeout handling
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:55:37 -0000

On 12.08.20 12:01, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Assume that the function is called within a worker not restricted by
> any timeout. This is true currently, because the only path leading to
> restore_vma_archive is via restore_file_archive being called within a
> worker by the create_vm API call.

you could branch on, or maybe even assert, the RESTEnvrionment is_worker()
helpers result, to tighten this assumption

> 
> Avoid generic timeout error message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> New in v2
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 13 ++++---------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> index 7169006..794819b 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> @@ -6162,7 +6162,6 @@ sub restore_vma_archive {
>  
>      $add_pipe->(['vma', 'extract', '-v', '-r', $mapfifo, $readfrom, $tmpdir]);
>  
> -    my $oldtimeout;
>      my $timeout = 5;
>  
>      my $devinfo = {};
> @@ -6261,9 +6260,9 @@ sub restore_vma_archive {
>  	    local $SIG{QUIT} =
>  	    local $SIG{HUP} =
>  	    local $SIG{PIPE} = sub { die "interrupted by signal\n"; };
> -	local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { die "got timeout\n"; };
> +	local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { die "got timeout reading device map\n"; };
>  
> -	$oldtimeout = alarm($timeout);
> +	alarm($timeout);
>  
>  	my $parser = sub {
>  	    my $line = shift;
> @@ -6274,11 +6273,7 @@ sub restore_vma_archive {
>  		my ($dev_id, $size, $devname) = ($1, $2, $3);
>  		$devinfo->{$devname} = { size => $size, dev_id => $dev_id };
>  	    } elsif ($line =~ m/^CTIME: /) {
> -		# we correctly received the vma config, so restore old timeout
> -		my $tmp = $oldtimeout || 0;
> -		$oldtimeout = undef;
> -		alarm($tmp);
> -
> +		alarm(0);
>  		&$print_devmap();
>  		print $fifofh "done\n";
>  		close($fifofh);
> @@ -6290,7 +6285,7 @@ sub restore_vma_archive {
>      };
>      my $err = $@;
>  
> -    alarm($oldtimeout) if $oldtimeout;
> +    alarm(0);
>  
>      $restore_deactivate_volumes->($cfg, $devinfo);
>  
>