From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5338F62513
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:58:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 44C9E2A982
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:58:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D738E2A975
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:58:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A7B1D43F19
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:58:03 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20201123123310.13898-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <c889f44d-d82e-3ada-9dcb-e8cfdd8a96c0@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:58:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201123123310.13898-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.084 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [storage.pm, pbsplugin.pm, plugin.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage 1/3] prune: introduce keep-all
 option
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:58:04 -0000

On 23.11.20 13:33, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> useful to have an alternative to the old maxfiles = 0. There has to
> be a way for vzdump to distinguish between:
> 1. use the /etc/vzdump.conf default (when no options are configured for the storage)
> 2. use no limit (when keep-all=1)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> A mutual dependency bump between storage and manager is needed for this and
> patch #3.
> 
>  PVE/Storage.pm           |  9 ++++++---
>  PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm | 15 +++++++++++----
>  PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm    | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!