From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7277E80B0C for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:18:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 67F1C25DA0 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:18:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8A3B425D84 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:18:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id i12so7563902wmq.4 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 23:18:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yApAeMxcihCJXvT+4eKWjhvSb0FrD58aog8aeeKwpS0=; b=Eo0fUIXlAOxwVMV/zWSSALCSGQKIUWqOS08BYWlvluv9pcKJ6+DWgArH+6cO0hzLFb ws6MDh6dHEMKawuqvSClJkTDJLkbxT/c29h9uH4cH90WiUsN19c7TGUPOTKxta+p1Bml Fy+PoIxw5wdnhnvHRr/HZN4AMVzyxkY40V9CzZ9Mlm1UqbxGXHnbu5jRTqs/I+UwpNd2 sdC2VJ0BDnT1U5R2s4qbhzOMhtXw4K3pSJd3wHx2EigA785A95DkSS55LJH4BaNBXnbA DY7pWMnv2iJaCOGdKIjFjmJnyA0GamJq+9gHNYoGtobu5nylvxTfxSIAs4m9weQ4WWYs ZLKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yApAeMxcihCJXvT+4eKWjhvSb0FrD58aog8aeeKwpS0=; b=SvAym7G7jAoYgmZy50LFUZlrCEOrypBtIBXZtl0vktXxe4q7uYIChB7qyt3HcJD5F3 oh7IfG7pZNG+CR9XiYNLQBNvBG0JNYZmFUd0w1WGLpavnNjg3mS1jaTEI03ZWyHNcaCE V2aY1j+Ew+zHUfDh3eoOZcAjDLnxbW8bPJW7tYLUTjCJ3NooTN4HWGkx1yJvktuN3zZF JuBu0b7LJthIB7yOBCa2IdSQJwgCqXxuxtCXvsC6gZ83YrYnS4F/hmcbQ/uV3+oJZuAs TyQhTtRGg4UOIuUbRCEjdiKu9hd4BmtPoQFT2HOJ/lsarKNrLhe+wEUz5QWPq93hSNGS E3pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532B5masxKHy1ugvYctHz5Sfe6zL6xHLuCTj1Xr1m4mJuaO5NBQG TQiv1q+eikn+34Rl2LXiFvMZQP3OFLk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziN2GPeMHQoSNy2WFbAdSIXiyWnf+f2gaRYNVfwFm04rb3qTeaXZZQcUIw0w2tMq2VJEQWyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a592:: with SMTP id o140mr4195625wme.10.1637306286207; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 23:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o25sm2266778wms.17.2021.11.18.23.18.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 23:18:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <c861c5f3-f52d-57ea-d5a4-96c74e6ccf8e@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:18:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>, ProxMox Users <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> References: <87d908a8-4604-9f31-20c5-dc5c279237d1@gmail.com> From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87d908a8-4604-9f31-20c5-dc5c279237d1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.118 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -1.727 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Setting bluestore_quick_fix_on_mount X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:18:43 -0000 Short: # ceph config get osd bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount Long: There is documentation at [1] regarding the upgrade process Octopus -> Pacific where this issue is menitoned as well as above command. Regards, Uwe [1] https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Ceph_Octopus_to_Pacific Am 19.11.21 um 02:26 schrieb Lindsay Mathieson: > Ok, dump question, lots of warnings about ensuring bluestore_quick_fix_on_mount is set to false > before upgrading (I'm upgrading from 6.4 to 7.1) > > > How do I check what *bluestore_quick_fix_on_mount* is set to, and how do I set it to false? > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >