From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C919EBAA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:12:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB7EF3F709 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0560641E39 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <c72e637b-2e92-2ff5-0bc5-0c99d55b2ec8@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:12:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20230605074350.98641-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <5ef14027-21ba-53d6-1520-5b11cb5e3434@proxmox.com> <f408dd24-a12e-00f0-513d-72f91f0db50a@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <f408dd24-a12e-00f0-513d-72f91f0db50a@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.094 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH edk2-firmware] add patch to work around older guest kernel bug X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 10:12:20 -0000 Am 07.06.23 um 11:04 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 06.06.23 um 16:26 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: >> applied, but fixed line endings of patch, edk2 (sadly) uses Windows-Style \r\n, >> but the patch only got \n, so failed building a DSC: >> > > Hmm, it's correct in my repository and in the formatted patch, but not > here in the mail anymore. Do I need to specify something special with > git send-email? > I asked Stoiko and sending the mail to him or myself directly works as intended, so it might be an issue with mailman. If anybody wants to send an edk2-firmware patch until there is time to look at the issue more closely, he said that the --transfer-encoding=base64 option for git send-email might be worth a shot.