From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745B37244F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6AB132E54C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EFB5E2E541
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:34:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 98BC743FBD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:34:52 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <c6a20324-4f24-9e91-a205-0b1e49cdc29a@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:34:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20210615112729.1099797-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210615112729.1099797-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.919 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [control.in]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH bullseye kernel 0/6] debug package and
 packaging/build cleanups
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:34:53 -0000

On 15.06.21 13:27, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
> patches 3,4,6 can easily be backported to buster as well.
>=20
> patch 5 is just an invocation of 'wrap-and-sort -f debian/control.in',
> so trivially backportable or adaptable in case only some of this series=

> gets applied/context has changed.
>=20
> patch 2 is needed for building on a clean bullseye system which does no=
t
> have (EOL) python2.7 around by default.
>=20
> patch 1 only makes sense to backport if we also backport the related
> tools, since the ones from buster seem to be too old for our kernel
> versions (see #3464).
>=20
> Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler (6):
>   build: keep unstripped kernel and module files
>   d/rules: build perf with python3
>   d/control: provide linux-libc-dev with version
>   d/control: remove references to 2.6 kernel
>   d/control: wrap-and-sort
>   d/rules: close race between 'cp' and module handling
>=20
>  debian/control.in | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  debian/rules      | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>=20


applied series, much thanks! No hard feelings either way on backporting..=
=2E