From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3B87E1FA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:29:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F170B185A5 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:29:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6799218597 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:29:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 37E48424EB for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:29:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <c5bb5cf2-5d0b-bd76-3839-a6ef61350177@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:29:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com> References: <20211109112721.130935-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> <20211109112721.130935-27-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20211109112721.130935-27-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.233 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH widget-toolkit 1/7] add pmxUserSelector X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:29:49 -0000 applied, but this has a weird dependency on 'pmx-users' which must be defined in the product itself (because they are not identical) for now it's ok, but we should resolve that soon (as soon as we want to reuse this in pbs i'd say)