From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <s.hanreich@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6081593173 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:02:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4BA9796D6 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:02:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 676D744064 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <c4729a58-a783-4f94-99c6-845850c7b64b@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:02:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20240405131806.388178-1-s.lendl@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240405131806.388178-1-s.lendl@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.577 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 pve-network 00/12] SDN: Testing VNets as a blackbox and fixing found bugs X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:02:59 -0000 Already mentioned in the commits, but gave this another spin today on my test VM and everything seems to work as intended: * Rollbacking on failure * Allocating an IPv6 IP on start, if there is already an IPv4 allocated * Ignoring subnets without any configured DHCP-Range Also, the pre-existing DHCP functionality also still seems to work as intended.