From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7132B9ED0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:57:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D78623678
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E2DAE2366D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:57:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BD25C428A3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:56:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <c31927ef-7583-8edb-5e68-491d6d859cad@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:56:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/100.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20220224142151.3206908-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220224142151.3206908-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH cluster 1/4] parse datacenter
 config: remove "\s*" from comment regex
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 06:57:34 -0000

On 24.02.22 15:21, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> To be consistent with PBS's implementation of multi-line comments
> remove "\s*" here too. Since the regex isn't lazy .* matches
> everything \s* would anyway. (Note that new lines occurs after "$").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  data/PVE/DataCenterConfig.pm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied series, thanks!