From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB2B81689
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:44:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 00BC81D615
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:44:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6AA781D607
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:44:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3A18545FFA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:44:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c2f05b83-422d-fd7d-3c31-93f1ce1178f0@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:43:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/95.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20211123120229.3606307-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211123120229.3606307-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.106 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH widget-toolkit v2 0/2] improve
 logpanel behaviour for fast tasks
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:44:01 -0000

On 23.11.21 13:02, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> improves the handling of fast moving tasks
> * no glitching
> * catching up to the end of the task log
> 
> changes from v1:
> * dropped 3/3 (different approach makes it obsolete)
> * set the length to total when we really need it
> * decouple updating the start parameter from the scrollevent
> * make the scrolling to bottom not rely on the scrollevent for updating
> 
> Dominik Csapak (2):
>   ui: logpanel: fix glitching fast task logs
>   ui: logpanel: catch up to very fast task logs with api calls
> 
>  src/panel/LogView.js | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

That one now works out very well on all my tests now.

applied, thanks!