From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356AB710F4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Apr 2021 10:02:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1ECDADA7A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Apr 2021 10:02:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 67ABADA6A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Apr 2021 10:02:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2C19E45868;
 Wed,  7 Apr 2021 10:02:22 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <c26c50b4-4a6e-c860-3235-c2cee89e63bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:02:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
References: <20210406184828.y23ajkfqgfazk4qk@zeha.at>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210406184828.y23ajkfqgfazk4qk@zeha.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Fwd: Bug#986371: Indeed this should work (also
 adding trivial test-case)
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:02:54 -0000

Hi,

On 06.04.21 20:48, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I believe you'll find Debian bug #986371 of interest. In Kernels
> 5.10+ the "guest time" accounting appears to be broken, in both
> Debian and Ubuntu. See https://bugs.debian.org/986371 for further
> details.
> 

Thanks for sharing, appreciated! I'll keep an eye on that bug and potential
fixes like "KVM: X86: Properly account for guest CPU time when considering
context tracking" [0].

cheers,
Thomas

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1617011036-11734-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com/