From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E55F90A08
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:59:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A56B849AF
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:58:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:58:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B74A438C4
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:58:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c085246b-b88f-403e-cfdd-ab0562d23349@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:58:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20230308145235.37342-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
 <ff373e8b-6f0a-7ac7-54d2-373de865b473@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <ff373e8b-6f0a-7ac7-54d2-373de865b473@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 0/4] improve local mail injection
 and add smtputf8 support
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:59:21 -0000

[..snip..]
> (postfix docs say here that they don't accept utf8
> without SMTPUTF8 dialog, but it worked when testing here...)

addendum, postfix says in the 'domain part' i naturally only tested
in headers + local part ;)

my point still stands though
(altough it's really a minor issue)