From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571C271624
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Sep 2021 09:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4CF572DB39
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Sep 2021 09:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CF5EE2DB2A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Sep 2021 09:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A1B744645
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Sep 2021 09:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <bfbf8dbf-d154-a70a-eff3-a57f0ac9437d@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:02:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/92.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20210908142254.4000779-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210908142254.4000779-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.258 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.922 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH zfsonlinux/stable-6] cherry-pick fix for
 assertion from 2.0.6-staging
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:03:25 -0000

On 08.09.21 16:22, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> The panic described in the issues closed by this commit were observed
> by some users.
> 
> Since the revert is already included in upstreams master and 2.1
> branches, and the proposed port to the 2.0 branches is already
> accepted the limit for regression should be small.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Tested by building pve-kernel-5.4 with zfs including this patch and
> booting it on 2 VMs of mine with replication enabled.
> 
>  ...onsolidate-arc_buf-allocation-checks.patch | 181 ++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/patches/series                         |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/0010-Revert-Consolidate-arc_buf-allocation-checks.patch
> 

as told off-list, I did the thankfully trivial cherry-pick at that time yesterday already
and also triggered a kernel build including an update to latest stable tag, so I rather
pushed that out.