From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67DDEBB671
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:29:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 45C631B75
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:29:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:29:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5BAC041E59
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:29:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <bdbbcc46-6fb1-48fc-94fd-7b2359684ce9@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:29:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
References: <20240108135456.74684-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20240108135456.74684-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [lxc.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container] fix #5160: fix move_mount
regression for mount point hotplug
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:29:43 -0000
Am 08.01.24 um 14:54 schrieb Filip Schauer:
> Set up an Apparmor profile to allow moving mounts for mount point
> hotplug.
>
> This fixes a regression caused by
> kernel commit 157a3537d6 ("apparmor: Fix regression in mount mediation")
>
> The commit introduced move_mount mediation, which now requires
> move_mount to be allowed in the Apparmor profile. Although it is allowed
> for most paths in the /usr/bin/lxc-start profile, move_mount is called
> with a file descriptor instead of a path in mountpoint_insert_staged,
> thus it is not affected by the allow rules in
> /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lxc/container-base.
>
Would it be difficult/impossible for us to do it path-based instead?
> To fix this, introduce a new Apparmor profile to allow move_mount on
> every mount, specifically for mount point hotplug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Fixes the issue and makes hotplug work again :)
However, I did run into one minor thing (number 1 below), but not sure
if it can be improved. Except the part about the undef warning which is
pre-existing. Another pre-existing issue I ran into is number 2 below,
should also be investigated, but is not caused by this patch.
1.
For an already running container, I got
> mp0: unable to hotplug mp0: failed to change apparmor profile:
after installing the patched pve-container package and attempting to
hotplug. Maybe that's expected and no big deal, because hotplug already
didn't work.
Checking in the journal, it's:
> AVC apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_profile" class="file" info="label not found" error=-2 profile="unconfined" name="pve-container-mounthotplug" pid=99919 comm=7076656461656D6F6E20776F726B65
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC.pm line 1978.
The latter warning seems to be pre-existing for the syswrite comparison
below:
> @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ sub mountpoint_hotplug :prototype($$$$$) {
> my $dir = get_staging_mount_path($opt);
>
> # Now switch our apparmor profile before mounting:
> - my $data = 'changeprofile /usr/bin/lxc-start';
> + my $data = 'changeprofile pve-container-mounthotplug';
> if (syswrite($aa_fd, $data, length($data)) != length($data)) {
> die "failed to change apparmor profile: $!\n";
> }
But then $! should be set according to 'perldoc -f syswrite' which it
wasn't telling from my quoted error message above ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> Returns the number of bytes actually
> written, or "undef" if there was an error (in this case the
> errno variable $! is also set)
2.
After shutdown+start, the hotplug worked as expected. Played around a
bit more and something strange happened with LVM as the storage: While
it worked the first time, when I shut down the container, detached the
mount point, started again and then tried to hot-plug, I got:
mp1: unable to hotplug mp1: command 'mount /dev/lvm/vm-129-disk-1
/var/lib/lxc/.pve-staged-mounts/mp1' failed: exit code 32
Doesn't seem to happen with ZFS or directory storage and starting with
the mount point pre-attached also worked fine with previously written
files still there.
Also booted into 6.2.16-20-pve, installed unpatched pve-container and it
seems the issue was already present then.