From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <moula.badji@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9847A736A3 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 813B71CB34 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 632A61CB1B for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:38:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id y124-20020a1c32820000b029010c93864955so14961644wmy.5 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:38:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:references:subject:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=FYvdMNUia5Qkyf+Kpf4T3+6nPXNwmEZuzAv6aPiS7cY=; b=rnSM4kWcuAnOAOakNmICUiNgs2Dn3Jd9xC2dr5EvdWJ7aa5h9PGB6+Cu0xsLOMVwj8 dJxIOjgbs6ZakgGINHMLaGBADQgdgoP7MO3WDnkcEBDImDQu28YG0DFN6CmBpQF2+gFz zDXFKKob1clAO+x0QNJDPyeUH6Fs6/s5+x8h6FYeTNwVCgpkFo8hBhaoTdFCROiWUoah fpHxpEq9FYlYflcrooPc1ypY2gIySxSKRXKueS4xu4c9UEwEd1i0BstZxVydMnJvqWC6 0JX+dxSO4GhRiS7DTIsfUajC+QJr+soRQNZHPiuUak98UQOgzHKhC0jIUL/zeHnBj1NY W5vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:references:subject:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=FYvdMNUia5Qkyf+Kpf4T3+6nPXNwmEZuzAv6aPiS7cY=; b=iC3urrFSeomuQlnelAIgskezpjW5WWydxIekCQtPUu/TbEK0LBoG+2ZkUP8kmXNXpi rB0fyczjdkSXpOyj4l1OV+g8brIKhnHHrKFdTD5wsURS5WuqtfJDC9Lord6utL/K0Rrr e5d44/6fLU+WIsANnoaIqT9t934yyx0fX7ExR0eJ8xO+KZInym1Qszj91UJBI7kgEhew nE6qEt3FmMvGmWTwA/gb23qu8arPcP9/9SQexyVstS3M6MeQtq6Hhj+5SCiIk37Z88t+ RKQ6c/7V6z9L4IfNlX8DCCw960EZ9uaeFebhgH4GAh6pmfzKj1JQoYeigBDbhpzXPg1N bXFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PIrtML4YD9YP9zdxuGhKr0z4TdrebEj5pv24xR64BhXPWhxj2 LPcFJvGzxAaBCL0+Og+87QT257YK8sYNBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoFwqfmMeY/NDQ7IvmyhWyWqhqzoJmkl8xsBPTtTqud5OyEXWZa8fg4/yYb9GOfgiPzy5aJA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb8a:: with SMTP id m10mr4001871wmi.95.1618504720034; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.60.14] (82-65-161-222.subs.proxad.net. [82.65.161.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm4624162wrd.55.2021.04.15.09.38.39 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <1618496842.5t56y2jruz.astroid@nora.none> From: Moula BADJI <moula.badji@gmail.com> Message-ID: <bb5e0698-c0c1-ffa9-49b5-becb5bb296e8@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:38:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1618496842.5t56y2jruz.astroid@nora.none> Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:40:50 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server++ 0/22] remote migration X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:39:17 -0000 It is a good initiative. I just want to add an idea on the migration of vms, with GPUs. I use K8S (K8s Workers with Nvidia GPU) on VMS deployed on PVE with Maas + Juju. But no possibility to migrate the vm even if the GPUs are identical on two different nodes. Maybe add a constraint with the fact of tagging the vms on MAAS like VM + GPU and check that the GPU is identical ... Thank you.