From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ADAC85868
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:54:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 295B41D9BD
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:53:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 164231D9AD
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:53:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D9F1E44F08
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:53:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ba99eb52-09fb-ff11-b095-6db69b758a1d@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:53:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20211220113509.3122873-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211220113509.3122873-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 1.850 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -3.608 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH login-manager] fix colors for tfa dialog
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:54:10 -0000
Seems to work fine.
Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
On 12/20/21 12:35, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> with the recent changes, the input field was invisible, adapting
> like the login dialog
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> lib/proxmox_tfa_form.dart | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/proxmox_tfa_form.dart b/lib/proxmox_tfa_form.dart
> index db3cfa7..3743455 100644
> --- a/lib/proxmox_tfa_form.dart
> +++ b/lib/proxmox_tfa_form.dart
> @@ -17,9 +17,12 @@ class _ProxmoxTfaFormState extends State<ProxmoxTfaForm> {
> @override
> Widget build(BuildContext context) {
> return Theme(
> - data: ThemeData.dark().copyWith(accentColor: Color(0xFFE47225)),
> + data: ThemeData.dark().copyWith(
> + colorScheme: ColorScheme.dark().copyWith(
> + secondary: ProxmoxColors.orange,
> + onSecondary: ProxmoxColors.supportGrey)),
> child: Scaffold(
> - backgroundColor: Theme.of(context).primaryColor,
> + backgroundColor: ProxmoxColors.supportBlue,
> extendBodyBehindAppBar: true,
> appBar: AppBar(
> elevation: 0.0,