From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17FE1FF0A7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:46:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2549B2151B; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:46:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:46:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: Migration VMID change To: James Tremblay , pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <93666ca5-7c9d-4be1-b270-6969b285878b@telrite.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <93666ca5-7c9d-4be1-b270-6969b285878b@telrite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790758004027 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.427 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: T5C3OC7PHX3NBQ46M2D6VRG62CTOHMNB X-Message-ID-Hash: T5C3OC7PHX3NBQ46M2D6VRG62CTOHMNB X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 9/28/26 8:57 PM, James Tremblay wrote: > is it possible to have the migration dialogue keep the VMID of the VM > its moving but have it editable? Hi, can you explain a bit more what you mean here? the field is editable and shows the current one as 'emptytext', what would you expect here differently? best regards Dominik