From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A9F6116C
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:24:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C226E2200F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:23:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6603622001
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:23:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id k11so5725287pgq.2
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language;
 bh=Ye1BoUo06Fvs94hVPEdE7wE8tEGqSVK8+HI/rkpV1vw=;
 b=eyFUTH3M3/lxvE6/dQppW56+vqQkCjj22vLZXc12dnmsosR4k5r+w26iwxYna+0h0n
 4lmQgVXYjPX+AUX+ycBBIfX9CBZX1J51boL+b7Zh9WC08bjvxLIz4FIdAfCYK2iiR/eE
 G7nlNdkdpQF2xHEKr2GMH6s7L0ATAu/J3LsFl3EVjSJL0vGez5iF/0jzP86m3IBBqpux
 vbKZwTtISkUKYZmlIt/MrKw4WEYauNxiaW6U/wa/Z+fxbX5bYeZZi3cF/+2fJgGgiJU1
 QKmfAM89PQsRPS8SgUtqI90ohkaOpT8o1IO2d974zt8l0/rDojx/MqIVCuXplkR3mPvo
 6DBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-language;
 bh=Ye1BoUo06Fvs94hVPEdE7wE8tEGqSVK8+HI/rkpV1vw=;
 b=foN4R+Nmokvns8S3g33ldAX5Bdf1kmOueeV7wKjo6aQ1LBG5CaA40ltPyOL0IjayT9
 sDtZ5WyLzS2nmZ7xYeLarkcol/Thqc+iu9vWbTbWQdzP78C+4l2iXcAd4Jw3dydVUaVb
 WsVlGYNQZSvqwBRrFIyZuSTLkou65J3IGlPlYLjKbuRk2w0jDKAaoBt9a6GOazUGkZqd
 jGMNgHJEuUtH5+yZV7L+TzQHVbcBlBMLbOu0tsNRUK7qLN9uozzyG2tuc55r23OkWvnD
 H3tILbL1QVWcmp48ao413A8BLvO+fk5BDhJnbaBdS8vBtFl404y0TmHUCdkXpv0t8BYq
 hb6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312ZYeO5d/lE5eMGhrPAp/FsOap320dT6cy1t3ScINH1Rvgr2Ot
 4U5tCl2cu9PAWTWL6q0f08Vdq1dGfJLR/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1nltRuKMcYCKPYFWbX7K8qr6BJfh+AXFt/YxB74ktG8+K3+Nl78qmqA3+Q3EnSk+4BwSO4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b02:: with SMTP id
 lx2mr14303762pjb.49.1606533806473; 
 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net.
 [167.179.176.9])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q29sm9321058pfg.146.2020.11.27.19.23.24
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:23:25 -0800 (PST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <930e1177-6137-aa49-718c-04f4fa74e975@lirmm.fr>
 <CAEp19KONd5_QG=20MHQHFA_-S9qOP9FK+YngA3HGdPcbHo8WOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b54d4b4d-17af-b885-e12f-f24f2f327ea3@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:23:21 +1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEp19KONd5_QG=20MHQHFA_-S9qOP9FK+YngA3HGdPcbHo8WOw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.225 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Python problem with upgrade to proxmoxVE6.3/ CEPH
 Nautilus 14.2.15
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:24:04 -0000

On 28/11/2020 2:45 am, Marco M. Gabriel wrote:
> It would be fine if anyone could test and confirm that an upgrade to
> Ceph Octopus resolves the issue.

Regards the dashboard not working on Proxmox 6.3 - upgrading to ceph 
Octopus fixed it for me. Also the dashboard looks a lot more swish :)

-- 
Lindsay