From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <m.limbeck@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00376600A3 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:51:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E27ED92EC for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:51:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5168592C2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:51:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0A22E461E8 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:51:23 +0100 (CET) To: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20210203142536.28480-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com> <20210203142536.28480-6-m.limbeck@proxmox.com> <295d4f46-fbdb-bb8d-9be1-e9fa1fb6dce0@proxmox.com> From: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <b409b602-35d5-272c-15c0-d44135865d58@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:51:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <295d4f46-fbdb-bb8d-9be1-e9fa1fb6dce0@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.626 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.182 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [qemu.pm, qemumigrate.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2] copy conntrack information on migration X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:51:54 -0000 On 2/5/21 9:11 AM, Fabian Ebner wrote: > Am 03.02.21 um 15:25 schrieb Mira Limbeck: >> Requires the pve-conntrack-tool. On migration the conntrack information >> from the source node is dumped and sent to the target node where it is >> then inserted. >> This helps with open connections during migration when the firewall >> is active. >> >> A new 'migrate-conntracks' option is added to the migrate_vm API call. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com> >> --- >> v2: >> - added the migrate-conntracks option so that it only copies conntrack >> information when requested >> >> PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 5 +++++ >> PVE/QemuMigrate.pm | 5 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm >> index 3571f5e..8c4336b 100644 >> --- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm >> +++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm >> @@ -3556,6 +3556,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ >> minimum => '0', >> default => 'migrate limit from datacenter or storage config', >> }, >> + 'migrate-conntracks' => { >> + description => "Migrate connection tracking info.", >> + type => 'boolean', >> + optional => 1, >> + } >> }, >> }, >> returns => { >> diff --git a/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm b/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm >> index 5c019fc..2ccef2a 100644 >> --- a/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm >> +++ b/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm >> @@ -1087,6 +1087,11 @@ sub phase2 { >> die "unable to parse migration status '$stat->{status}' - >> aborting\n"; >> } >> } >> + >> + if ($self->{opts}->{'migrate-conntracks'}) { >> + $self->log('info', 'copy conntrack information'); >> + PVE::Tools::run_command([['/usr/bin/pve-conntrack-tool', >> 'dump'], [@{$self->{rem_ssh}}, '/usr/bin/pve-conntrack-tool', >> 'insert']]); > > Just wondering if having an eval here and still continue with the > migration if there's a problem would make sense? OTOH one can argue > that if the option is set and the connection information cannot be > copied, it's better to abort. > I'm in favor of aborting, but perhaps eval and die on error with a custom error message? >> + } >> } >> sub phase2_cleanup { >>