From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783986168C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:45:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5FEC3F19E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:45:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8FE8EF194
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5203545D1A;
 Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>
References: <CAMnnoUJ41C8L2TyCch0_KXGkKm57Fee8_D2Zy1XqiODKCuuTbg.ref@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMnnoUJ41C8L2TyCch0_KXGkKm57Fee8_D2Zy1XqiODKCuuTbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4e732c70-86a1-2d61-3efd-47f5e3a470a6@coppint.com>
 <CAMnnoULkHyRbRnRdiqGrojAREfb5O1SO=CCyGGwGL1gDgEc3Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <521737835.3272203.1601723722503.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <b1f56f15-549c-51b2-9c39-d7f6f52ba61c@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:45:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <521737835.3272203.1601723722503.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.136 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Ceph 15.2.5 update?
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:45:11 -0000

On 03.10.20 13:15, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm - will that actually work?
>>>
>>> My understanding was that for Proxmox you had to use the Proxmox-spec=
ific
>>> Ceph packages - just like there's a Proxmox-specific kernel etc.
>=20
> Proxmox don't have any extra patch on ceph package, so you can use pack=
age from ceph official repo.
>=20

That's not true, and I would not recommend using another repo, ceph itsel=
f is
really not good at doing Debian packages, so especially dependency stuff =
is
often quite wrong to incompatible with PVE.

https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Dceph.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dpatches;h=3Dd30ebbccd3=
1cedfae76dd1426298e97874d8a8f1;hb=3DHEAD

> (Proxmox have his own repo, to be able to test ceph minor versions befo=
re releases, to avoid bug,.....)
>=20

That's an additional reason, but mainly we do it to have full control
over packaging.

Anyway, 15.2.5 is out on the test repository since yesterday.