From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CC77E97A for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:20:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BBCEB8DB8 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:20:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 04BE08DA9 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:20:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D002E421A9 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:20:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:20:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/95.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Oguz Bektas References: <20211110130746.1025299-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20211110130746.1025299-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.134 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH kernel-meta] boot-tool: fix whitespace in generated loader configuration X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:20:58 -0000 On 10.11.21 14:07, Oguz Bektas wrote: > issue reported in forum [0] > > seems like it came in with 2a8a4b5e37e87a0a994fe3820b015e051e6259fb > > [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/problem-with-proxmox-boot-tool.99043/ > > before: > ======== > $ cat /mnt/foo/loader/entries/proxmox-5.11.22-7-pve.conf > title Proxmox Virtual Environment > version 5.11.22-7-pve > options root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs iommu=pt > linux /EFI/proxmox/5.11.22-7-pve/vmlinuz-5.11.22-7-pve > initrd /EFI/proxmox/5.11.22-7-pve/initrd.img-5.11.22-7-pve > > after: > ======== > $ proxmox-boot-tool refresh > $ cat /mnt/foo/loader/entries/proxmox-5.11.22-7-pve.conf > title Proxmox Virtual Environment > version 5.11.22-7-pve > options root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs iommu=pt > linux /EFI/proxmox/5.11.22-7-pve/vmlinuz-5.11.22-7-pve > initrd /EFI/proxmox/5.11.22-7-pve/initrd.img-5.11.22-7-pve > > Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas > --- > proxmox-boot/zz-proxmox-boot | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > applied, but reworked the commit message to clarify that this has no actual functional impact (but still good to have to avoid confusion), thanks!