From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70D873989
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Oct 2021 07:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D41AB21B38
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Oct 2021 06:59:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BBE2321B28
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Oct 2021 06:59:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 892B745791
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Oct 2021 06:59:55 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
References: <20211006151957.437820-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com>
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <b0cf0835-e3e6-c1dc-4277-b03cdc0d8a64@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 06:59:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211006151957.437820-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.548 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.964 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: language and
 formatting fixup
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 05:00:26 -0000

some questions below:

On 10/6/21 5:19 PM, Dylan Whyte wrote:
> --- a/docs/installation.rst
> +++ b/docs/installation.rst
> @@ -19,24 +19,24 @@ for various management tasks such as disk management.
>      `Proxmox Backup`_ without the server part.

We use `Proxmox Backup`_ here (which is defined in epilog.rst)

>   The disk image (ISO file) provided by Proxmox includes a complete Debian system
> -as well as all necessary packages for the `Proxmox Backup`_ server.
> +as well as all necessary packages for the `Proxmox Backup Server`_.
>   
>   The installer will guide you through the setup process and allow
> -you to partition the local disk(s), apply basic system configurations
> -(e.g. timezone, language, network), and install all required packages.
> +you to partition the local disk(s), apply basic system configuration
> +(for example timezone, language, network), and install all required packages.
>   The provided ISO will get you started in just a few minutes, and is the
>   recommended method for new and existing users.
>   
> -Alternatively, `Proxmox Backup`_ server can be installed on top of an
> +Alternatively, `Proxmox Backup Server`_ can be installed on top of an

So why do you change that here? Where is `Proxmox Backup Server`_ defined?