From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DACA991766
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B3F6F21B6A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EEB2343CB4
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ae860ce3-3ab5-b7a1-89c3-ff0cd34c36a5@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:16:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/107.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20221111150527.538248-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
<20221111150527.538248-3-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
<ba1d5571-e831-e252-f0a4-b5f91ee07327@proxmox.com>
<f316ee98-5711-b8db-3be4-52656a77dcba@proxmox.com>
<2ff2f3db-7243-d1e8-a710-8e8ea4adddd0@proxmox.com>
<1477baac-d0ee-39da-676f-6a2a220bc355@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1477baac-d0ee-39da-676f-6a2a220bc355@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=AWL -0.032 Adjusted
score from AWL reputation of From: =?UTF-8?Q?address=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9
Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
=?UTF-8?Q?Alignment=0A=09?=NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF
=?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2 2/2] asciidoc-pve: ignore anchor
names in curly braces
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:16:43 -0000
Am 14/11/2022 um 11:13 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
>> or move it to a single one replacing the whole non-greedy part, someth=
ing like
>> (untested): [^{}\[\]"']+
>>
> should work to, yes. i used grep to test this and it worked (i did need=
> to do some escaping for the quotes, but the idea seems solid). i'll sen=
d
> a v3 with this if you approve =F0=9F=98=84
>=20
would be fine for me, but no hard feeling on either; so go with what seem=
s
the most reasonable for you.