From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E1F1FF0C0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6C2F2214AB; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:15:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:15:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: applied: [PATCH manager] 8to9: adapt to changed signature of get_vm_machine() From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260129132623.127384-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <4680ba6c-fd9e-47b3-b3b7-cc4ee97fca14@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792584942698 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.346 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: XI7N63VWG7KBT4GL54UBQN3A2Z77RTTF X-Message-ID-Hash: XI7N63VWG7KBT4GL54UBQN3A2Z77RTTF X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 21.10.26 um 1:29 PM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 23.09.26 um 11:06 AM schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> Am 29.01.26 um 2:25 PM schrieb Fiona Ebner: >>> The signature change in qemu-server does not lead to any breakage, >>> because the function still looks at $conf->{arch}. Still, it should be >>> adapted. >>> >>> Reported-by: Thomas Lamprecht >>> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner >>> --- >>> >>> Dependency bump for qemu-server needed! >> >> Ping. Still applies and the bump is already covered now :) >> > > Ping. Could somebody give me a review here? Ah sorry, this already got applied as: 08ae5827 ("8to9: adapt to changed signature of get_vm_machine()")