From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26133BB9B2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:30:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 07EF89451
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:30:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:30:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34D2B41FBE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:30:23 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <a9c48db8-4703-46eb-b86a-515deeef7fab@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:30:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20240108135456.74684-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <bdbbcc46-6fb1-48fc-94fd-7b2359684ce9@proxmox.com>
From: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <bdbbcc46-6fb1-48fc-94fd-7b2359684ce9@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.089 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container] fix #5160: fix move_mount
 regression for mount point hotplug
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:30:54 -0000

On 25/03/2024 11:29, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 08.01.24 um 14:54 schrieb Filip Schauer:
>> Set up an Apparmor profile to allow moving mounts for mount point
>> hotplug.
>>
>> This fixes a regression caused by
>> kernel commit 157a3537d6 ("apparmor: Fix regression in mount mediation")
>>
>> The commit introduced move_mount mediation, which now requires
>> move_mount to be allowed in the Apparmor profile. Although it is allowed
>> for most paths in the /usr/bin/lxc-start profile, move_mount is called
>> with a file descriptor instead of a path in mountpoint_insert_staged,
>> thus it is not affected by the allow rules in
>> /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lxc/container-base.
>>
> Would it be difficult/impossible for us to do it path-based instead?


A path-based approach would not work as things are right now, since we
use the file descriptor to issue a move_mount from within the
container's namespace, where we cannot access the staging directory with
a path.

>> To fix this, introduce a new Apparmor profile to allow move_mount on
>> every mount, specifically for mount point hotplug.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
> Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
>
> Fixes the issue and makes hotplug work again :)
>
> However, I did run into one minor thing (number 1 below), but not sure
> if it can be improved. Except the part about the undef warning which is
> pre-existing. Another pre-existing issue I ran into is number 2 below,
> should also be investigated, but is not caused by this patch.
>
> 1.
>
> For an already running container, I got
>
>> mp0: unable to hotplug mp0: failed to change apparmor profile:
> after installing the patched pve-container package and attempting to
> hotplug. Maybe that's expected and no big deal, because hotplug already
> didn't work.
>
> Checking in the journal, it's:
>
>> AVC apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_profile" class="file" info="label not found" error=-2 profile="unconfined" name="pve-container-mounthotplug" pid=99919 comm=7076656461656D6F6E20776F726B65


This happens because the new apparmor profile
"pve-container-mounthotplug" is not loaded correctly in postinst.
This is fixed in v2.


>> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC.pm line 1978.
> The latter warning seems to be pre-existing for the syswrite comparison
> below:
>
>> @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ sub mountpoint_hotplug :prototype($$$$$) {
>>   	my $dir = get_staging_mount_path($opt);
>>   
>>   	# Now switch our apparmor profile before mounting:
>> -	my $data = 'changeprofile /usr/bin/lxc-start';
>> +	my $data = 'changeprofile pve-container-mounthotplug';
>>   	if (syswrite($aa_fd, $data, length($data)) != length($data)) {
>>   	    die "failed to change apparmor profile: $!\n";
>>   	}
>
> But then $! should be set according to 'perldoc -f syswrite' which it
> wasn't telling from my quoted error message above  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
>> Returns the number of bytes actually
>>              written, or "undef" if there was an error (in this case the
>>              errno variable $! is also set)


A fix for the warning is in the v2.


> 2.
>
> After shutdown+start, the hotplug worked as expected. Played around a
> bit more and something strange happened with LVM as the storage: While
> it worked the first time, when I shut down the container, detached the
> mount point, started again and then tried to hot-plug, I got:
> mp1: unable to hotplug mp1: command 'mount /dev/lvm/vm-129-disk-1
> /var/lib/lxc/.pve-staged-mounts/mp1' failed: exit code 32
>
> Doesn't seem to happen with ZFS or directory storage and starting with
> the mount point pre-attached also worked fine with previously written
> files still there.
>
> Also booted into 6.2.16-20-pve, installed unpatched pve-container and it
> seems the issue was already present then.