From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1016053B for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:24:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04BFA1729 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:24:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay161.nicmail.ru (relay161.nicmail.ru [91.189.117.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D51F9170A for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:24:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.28.138.152] (port=38126 helo=[192.168.8.155]) by relay.hosting.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1nKGXd-0007Tm-4D; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:24:06 +0300 Received: from [62.105.41.93] (account tsabolov@t8.ru HELO [192.168.8.155]) by incarp1104.int.hosting.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1nKGXd-0005Km-7o; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:24:05 +0300 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:24:04 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Eneko Lacunza , pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <10232bf8-ad79-e262-9861-bcc88f3c1bb9@t8.ru> <094b0da0-94b9-3b0f-3358-78d8e51561de@binovo.es> From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= In-Reply-To: <094b0da0-94b9-3b0f-3358-78d8e51561de@binovo.es> X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Auth: dkim=none X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] New Disk on one node of Cluster. X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:38 -0000 Hi Eneko, 16.02.2022 11:58, Eneko Lacunza пишет: > Hi Sergey, > > El 16/2/22 a las 9:52, Сергей Цаболов escribió: >> >> I have 7 node's PVE Cluster + Ceph storage >> >> In 7 node I add new 2 disks and want to make specific new osd pool on >> Ceph. >> >> Is possible with new  disk create specific pool ? > > You are adding 2 additional disk in each node, right? No, I add the new disk on node 7, not on each node of cluster. > > You can assign them to a new pool, creating custom crush rules. Yes this I know how is make new rules In one node I for test added 2 ssd disk and make the new rules| | |ceph osd crush rule create-replicated replicated_ssd default host ssd  and with this rule I  make new pool vm.ssd | > > Why do you want to use those disks for a different pool? What disks do > you have now, and what disk are the new? (for example, are all HDD or > SSD...) I want make new pool with HDD - SAS for specific storage of some Windows Server VM. In existing pools : vm.pool  base pool for VM disks cephfs_data  some disks and ISO and other datas vm.ssd   new pool I make from 2 ssd disk I try to test the Windows Server disk speed for Read/Write and RND4K Q32T1 with CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4x64 If I configure the VM disk to Sata and SSD emulation,Cache: Write back and Discard, Speed write/read is very good  something like : SEQ1M Q8T1 1797.43/1713.07 SEQ1M Q1T1 1790.77/1350.55 but the RND4K Q32T1 and RND4K Q1T1 is not good, very small. After the test I think if I add 2 new disks,  configure is for specific pool maybe my speed for  RND4K Q32T1 and RND4K Q1T1 maybe they will get better Thank you > > Cheers > > Eneko Lacunza > Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico > Binovo IT Human Project > > Tel. +34 943 569 206 |https://www.binovo.es > Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun > > https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO > https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ Sergey TS The best Regard _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user