From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80C86113B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C9E6526F56
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 22D8626F4B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE972437EF
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <a92e1fbc-e039-e07d-1d18-f886f60518e3@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/98.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20220217125859.804194-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220217125859.804194-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] fix #3323: dry-run for cli
 backup subcommand
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:38:34 -0000

On 17.02.22 13:58, Markus Frank wrote:
> adds a dry-run parameter for "proxmox-backup-client backup".
> With this parameter on, it simply prints out what would be uploaded,
> instead of uploading it.
> 

looks ok in general, some comments to code style, or better said, refactor
potential inline.

> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs | 194 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs b/proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs
> index 081028f2..b992695c 100644
> --- a/proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs
> +++ b/proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs
> @@ -613,6 +613,11 @@ fn spawn_catalog_upload(
>                 description: "Verbose output.",
>                 optional: true,
>             },
> +           "dry-run": {
> +               type: Boolean,
> +               description: "Just show what backup would do, but do not upload anything.",
> +               optional: true,
> +           },
>         }
>     }
>  )]
> @@ -633,6 +638,8 @@ async fn create_backup(
>  
>      let verbose = param["verbose"].as_bool().unwrap_or(false);
>  
> +    let dry_run = param["dry-run"].as_bool().unwrap_or(false);
> +
>      let backup_time_opt = param["backup-time"].as_i64();
>  
>      let chunk_size_opt = param["chunk-size"].as_u64().map(|v| (v*1024) as usize);
> @@ -845,94 +852,117 @@ async fn create_backup(
>      let mut catalog_result_rx = None;
>  
>      for (backup_type, filename, target, size) in upload_list {
> -        match backup_type {


did you tried of either matching the tuple (backup_type, dry_run) or using if's in
the match arm, e.g., something like:

match backup_type {
    BackupSpecificationType::CONFIG if dry_run => printdry("config file", filename),
    BackupSpecificationType::LOGFILE if dry_run => printdry("log file", filename),
    ...
    BackupSpecificationType::CONFIG => {
        let upload_options = UploadOptions {
        ...
    },
    ...,
}

The one with matching the tuple has the slight advantage of ensuring that we'd ensure
to always cover all possibilities, that'd be relevant e.g., if a new type gets added
to avoid it's send by mistake if one forgot to add an explicit dry run here, i.e.,
something that your current solution also avoids.

> -            BackupSpecificationType::CONFIG => {
> -                let upload_options = UploadOptions {
> -                    compress: true,
> -                    encrypt: crypto.mode == CryptMode::Encrypt,
> -                    ..UploadOptions::default()
> -                };
> -
> -                println!("Upload config file '{}' to '{}' as {}", filename, repo, target);
> -                let stats = client
> -                    .upload_blob_from_file(&filename, &target, upload_options)
> -                    .await?;
> -                manifest.add_file(target, stats.size, stats.csum, crypto.mode)?;
> -            }
> -            BackupSpecificationType::LOGFILE => { // fixme: remove - not needed anymore ?
> -                let upload_options = UploadOptions {
> -                    compress: true,
> -                    encrypt: crypto.mode == CryptMode::Encrypt,
> -                    ..UploadOptions::default()
> -                };
> -
> -                println!("Upload log file '{}' to '{}' as {}", filename, repo, target);
> -                let stats = client
> -                    .upload_blob_from_file(&filename, &target, upload_options)
> -                    .await?;
> -                manifest.add_file(target, stats.size, stats.csum, crypto.mode)?;
> -            }
> -            BackupSpecificationType::PXAR => {
> -                // start catalog upload on first use
> -                if catalog.is_none() {
> -                    let catalog_upload_res = spawn_catalog_upload(client.clone(), crypto.mode == CryptMode::Encrypt)?;
> -                    catalog = Some(catalog_upload_res.catalog_writer);
> -                    catalog_result_rx = Some(catalog_upload_res.result);
> +        if dry_run {
> +            match backup_type {
> +                BackupSpecificationType::CONFIG => {
> +                    println!("Would upload config file'{}' to '{}' as {}", filename, repo, target);

please factor above print out in a local closure/helper-fn, besides reducing repetition
it would also avoid on having inconsistencies like missing a whitespace after "file" ;-)