From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <sleemburg@it-functions.nl> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83AC5629D6 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 71F6612A85 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0.it-functions.nl (mx0.it-functions.nl [178.32.167.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C571F12A4D for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:43:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.100.26.194] (helo=daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl) by mx0.it-functions.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>) id 1k9VxH-00007R-Ef for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:01:19 +0200 Received: from [192.168.254.32] by daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>) id 1k9VxE-0006WY-SA for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:01:16 +0200 To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> From: Stephan Leemburg <sleemburg@it-functions.nl> Organization: IT Functions Message-ID: <a7cc597b-0327-a36b-ffe2-82553a334d55@it-functions.nl> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:01:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: nl X-Scan-Signature: b6e5a4327e8bb214d6dcdfd4f1f4ac72 X-GeoIP: NL X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav-new X-Scan-Signature: ceb8ffd50fa070afec80efc4e4a252cf X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -2.079 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:43:11 -0000 Hi Alexandre, Sorry for the late reply. But actually, I do have 2 OVH based subscribed proxmox systems. They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it works. What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production servers, then I think I can help you. Kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet, Stephan Leemburg IT Functions e: sleemburg@it-functions.nl p: +31 (0)71 889 23 33 m: +31(0)6 83 22 30 69 kvk: 27313647 On 19-08-2020 08:57, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently looking to test ip failover (single /32 ip or subnet range) > on public provider like hetzner or ovh. > > I have see a lot of users asking questions on the forum about routed setup. > > /32 is a bit tricky with point to point configuration, > > and I'll would like to implement them in sdn configuration (as I'm working on ip management). > > > I just need a small server, 1 single failover /32 ip and 1 small failover subnet. > > > If nobody can help, no problem, I'll rent a small server for 1 month. > > > Alexandre > > > (BTW: I'll try to send a new sdn patch series next week, I'm currently working on ip dns api registration) > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >